777 Pet Scan/CT /Tomography of Words 2A [Mortality Risk Assessment] 777

Change the pattern of the Image to procreate a different Image pattern

Kings own Nothing but own Everything

Kings have Knowledge and Wisdom

Queens temper the Kings Knowledge and Wisdom

 

Filler Information;

RNA sequencing=  is a technique that displays the quantity and sequences of RNA in samples using next generation sequencing.   It is the mathematical probability that a transcriptions of an expression of thought patterns (pictures and words) are encoded within our RNA.   Expressions, thoughts are carried from generation to generation.

Following yesterdays blog on the word, ” Malak [angel]”, it would be apparent that the thought of ones mind is spoken in words.  Conveyed to an human agent, coming from, spoken from, an human agent.  Thoughts act like spirits crossing the atmosphere to our senses our ears.  Words and thoughts by their own volition have a intrinsic value and worth to the receiver.   How do you judge the Mortality Risk of thoughts if we adsorb them? How do you do a,  statistical valuation and do a cost benefit analysis on that thought or word?

Mortality Risk Assessment

“Statistical Valuation of Thoughts”

Governments use metrics to give estimates of the willingness of people pay for small reductions in Mortality Risks Assessment associated with medical diseases and other governmental  endeavors.

They call this the “Value of Statistical Life“.   This is an aggregate dollar amount [unit amounts] that a large group of people are willing to pay for a reduction in their individuals dying in a year.  Such as they could expect fewer death among a group during the year.

The same methodology can be applied to the simplest form of pictographs as you can see in the ancient Sumerian alphabet .  The Mortality Risk Assessment of  not being taught the root word and the stems that can spring from the root word.   Then you walk off into the realm of “Value of Statistical Life“.   Which thoughts create life and which ones do not.

Example;

The Parent pictograph in the ancient Semitic alphabet of the man and the woman nothing had changed that since the dawn of time.

Image result for sumerian picture writing is called what?

Image result for pictographs of male female bathrooms
21st Century

As you can see the pictograph above not much has changed much in over, at best,  by historical records in over 8000 thousand years.   So the Statistical valuation of the thought, male and female does not have a Mortality Risk Assessment signed to it.   They are both viable Parent words.

However if you mistranslated the Parent word then you have a valuation of risk assigned a Mortality Risk Assessment comes into play.

Related image

What is the aggreagate dollar amount people are going to agree to accommodate a misinterpretation of a Parent Word?

When it comes mistranslated of words in the Hebrew manuscripts into a theosophy of images causing people to run into them.  Then you have a Mortality Risk Assessment in play.  You are cognitively, through behavioral modification, lying altering the statistical valuation of life.  Regulating the responsibility of the word to metaphysical epiphanies.  It will become over time impotent then a new stem has to grow from the Parent word.

Angels are thoughts generated by human agents that carry a value and a weight to the ears of others.  To increase ones statistical value of life.   To lie carries a Mortality Risk Assessment from the sender to the receiver of the thought.  What is the cost benefit?

In yesterday,s blog, we looked at the word Malak and the word Elohim,  to miss use the Parent words is to create other thoughts that have no statistical valuation of life.   A lie however has a cost benefit to the sender in economic gains, especially when dealing with religions and pooped out opinions that are like weeds.  Truth never has an economic gain because it never seeks fame and fortune.

Malak 

These beings are clearly designated by the English word “angel.” The terminology of biblical Hebrew is not so exact. Malʾakh (מַלְאַךְ), the word most often used, means “messenger” (cf. Ugaritic lak “to send”). It is applied frequently to human agents (e.g., Gen. 32:4) and is sometimes used figuratively (e.g., Ps. 104:4).

[ Mal’ak (also spelled MalakMelek) is the Semitic word for “angel“. (Arabicملاك‎, malākHebrew מַלְאָךְ; Ge’ez መልዐክ, mal`ākAramaic מלאך). The plural of malak (“angels”) is ملائكه malaa`ikah in Arabic, מַלְאָכִים malakim in Hebrew, and መላዕክት mala`ikt in Ge’ez.

In Arabic and Turkish, it is also used as a given name (both male and female).

The Turkish form of the name is Melek. ]

So Malak (angel) is a male or female who understands the words of his or her Father.  Conveying a message to others. A counsel of thought.

Elohim

[Elohim (Hebrew: אֱלֹהִים [ʔɛloːˈhim]) is a word in the Hebrew Bible, which sometimes means deities in the plural, and elsewhere refers to a single deity, particularly (but not always) the Jewish God.

The word is identical to the usual plural of el, meaning gods or magistrates, and is cognate to the ‘l-h-m found in Ugaritic, where it is used for the pantheon of Canaanite gods, the children of El, and conventionally vocalized as “Elohim“. Most uses of the term Elohim in the later Hebrew text imply a view that is at least monolatrist at the time of writing, and such usage (in the singular), as a proper title for the supreme deity, is generally not considered to be synonymous with the term elohim, “gods” (plural, simple noun). Rabbinic scholar Maimonides wrote that the various other usages are commonly understood to be homonyms.

The notion of divinity underwent radical changes in the early period of Israelite identity and development of Ancient Hebrew religion. The ambiguity of the term elohim is the result of such changes, cast in terms of “vertical translatability”, i.e. the re-interpretation of the gods of the earliest recalled period as the national god of monolatrism as it emerged in the 7th to 6th century BCE in the Kingdom of Judah and during the Babylonian captivity, and further in terms of monotheism by the emergence of Rabbinical Judaism in the 2nd century CE.]

Monolatry (Greek: μόνος [monos] = single, and λατρεία [latreia] = worship) is belief in the existence of many gods but with the consistent worship of only one deity.

“In the ancient Near East the existence of divine beings was universally accepted without questions. … The question was not whether there is only one elohim, but whether there is any elohim like Yahweh.

When you lie about the Parent of the word then the “statistical valuation of life” costs more to save a large group of people.  The costs outweigh the benefits.   However if I save one and the cost are negotiable.  Then the Mortality Risk Assessment becomes easier for me to evaluate ones life.    To increase the valuation of ones life.  To many people sit around playing the Dead Mans Hand, “Whoa is me”.

For you see we all of the Spirit of Life within us,  where it came from and where it is going.   Scientist cannot even answer that question.  But we all have an obligation to pass that, Spirit of Life, on to others.   Where I came from and where I am going I will let you know when I get there.  Someone just asked me why?

We have all sat before our Father since time began no denying that.

Kings own Nothing but own Everything

Kings have Knowledge and Wisdom

Queens temper the Kings Knowledge and Wisdom

 

2 thoughts on “777 Pet Scan/CT /Tomography of Words 2A [Mortality Risk Assessment] 777

Comments are closed.